The is not owned by the machine owner , he was paying one dollor/transection to the shop owner.? - atm machine owners
is the owner of the shop remains the legal responsibility for ATM machine.as I mentioned in the previous question, all holders have not signed the shop owner said the machine responsibility.he Agreement.The never mentioned on fire damages paid $ 1/transaction.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Atm Machine Owners The Is Not Owned By The Machine Owner , He Was Paying One Dollor/transection To The Shop Owner.?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
not entirely clear. What happens to me is that someone has put an ATM in a store. The aircraft was damaged. Now the machine owner is willing to pay the store owner for damages? Read the contract. ATMs someone held without a detailed contract. not specifically detailed, but it is expected that when someone responsible in the possession of property of another person.
Perhaps someone has the following questions. I do not. Just read these lines, is the absence of a signed document, not that there is no contract. The courts must decide whether there was an agreement on the insurance. Moreover, the question of the duty of a parent or guardian. If you are establishing and maintaining the property of someone who has rights and whether that right has been violated depends on the cause of the fire. A trustee does not guarantee the security of property, but it was the duty of care.
Post a Comment